Thursday, March 03, 2011

Power-Sharing Deal Falling Apart?

This is disturbing:

BAGHDAD (AFP) – Iyad Allawi, leader of the bloc that won the most seats in Iraq's 2010 elections, said on Wednesday that he will not chair a supervisory body that he was to have headed as part of a power-sharing deal.
The National Council on Strategic Policies was to be created as a sop to Allawi when rival Nuri al-Maliki was nominated to a second term as prime minister in November, and was intended to constrain Maliki's powers by providing a body for other politicians to make decisions on major issues.

It has yet to be established, though, as a law required to bring it into existence has not been passed.

"I will not participate in the national council," the former premier said in an interview with the Al-Rasheed satellite television channel to be broadcast later on Wednesday. Key quotes were provided beforehand to AFP.

"This is a final decision, and Iraqiya can choose another person instead of me," he said, referring to his Iraqiya bloc which won 91 seats in the 325-member parliament, two more than Maliki's State of Law coalition. Allawi attributed his decision to "the lack of implementation of the national partnership agreement."

And not even a day later...

Now Allawi is not naive. He knows very well that a) the Kurds will stick with Maliki with whom they have a strategic deal. He has so far given them what they wanted, including the right to resume oil exports, and b) the Sadrists and ISCI--even if they ally with him--will not allow him to become Prime Minister, as we saw during 9 months of negotiations. So whay is he doing this?
Ayad Allawi traveled to Najaf on Thursday for talks with Moqtada Al-Sadr. At a joint press conference with Sadr, Allawi announced that Iraqiya seeks to build better ties with the Sadrist movement, ISCI and the Kurdistan Alliance. “Iraqiya wants to build positive relations with all blocs and political movements in the country, particularly with the Sadrist movement.”
Note that yesterday, the Sadrists alluded to the possibility of forging a new majority coalition with Allawi, ISCI and the Kurds. In my opinion, this call is simply another example of Sadr's disruptive attitude.


Tapline said...

Allawi, the elected leader should be PM and that should end it....Too much parlementarian bickering....They should have gone with a republic under a duly elected president..different branches of government to compliment and keep checks and balances going like it should....Only my opinion....everyone has one...stay well

hameed Abid said...

Dear O and M

The way the power sharing was intended did not work.

You cannot have two heads of governments competing with each other over supremacy.

It will be folly, and things will not ever get done. Bickering and counterminding will be plenty, the people will suffer due to the parlysing of decisions which are sorely needed and timeley at that.

Duality does not work in real lifelet alone in Governments of two parties who are suspicious of each other.

That marriage was made in haste under pressure and the two parties did not believe in it. Everyone thought he was winning. such is the language of the deal which was wide open to interpretataions.

Allawi should seek replacing Amro Mussa As head of the Arab League- that toothless and expensive talking shop full of Dictators and Tyrants. since he was once supporting 'Arab' Unity, Freedom and Socialism, when he was a Ba'athist under Saddam's Regime?

Kind regards

alax said...

Best Seo Site I Social Bookmarking Post I Sell Directory List I Directory Posting I Blog List I Blog posting I Forum posting I Sell Forum List I PR 01I PR 02 I Add your URL to Google I Add your URL to MSN I Add your URL to Yahoo I Backlinks posting I Keyword Marketing I Facebook wall post I Twitter wall post I Get Real Visitors I USA Visitors I Uk Visitors.